Congestion, air pollution, inadequate public transport services – these are just some of the issues cities around the world are having to try and mitigate. Could Mobility as a Service (MaaS) be the solution?
A recent webinar presented on Intelligent Transport looked at the different approaches currently being proposed, discussing the various benefits they offer and the challenges they face.
What is MaaS?
Although MaaS is enabled by technology, it was made clear from the get go that it is fundamentally about the user perspective.
Keynote speaker, Jonathan Donavan, CPO of Masabi, highlighted one definition provided by University College London’s MaaS Lab:
“Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is a user-centric, intelligent mobility management and distribution system, in which an integrator brings together offerings of multiple mobility service providers, and provides end-users access to them through a digital interface, allowing them to seamlessly plan and pay for mobility.”
Essentially, MaaS aims to provide the convenience of a private vehicle without the need for ownership, making users’ lives easier.
From the user perspective, it has to make it easier to plan and pay for travel, match the right mode of transport for the journey, be cost-effective and provide complete journey coverage. From a city perspective, it has to move people away from private cars, keep the city moving, provide equitable service to riders and optimise transport resources.
Real world examples
In an attempt to address these needs, a number of pilots have emerged. These include: the Whim app in Finland, which has now expanded to projects in the UK and Europe; Transport for Greater Manchester; UbiGo in Gothenburg, which has expanded to Stockholm; and NaviGoGo, Scotland’s first MaaS web application, similar to UbiGo, which was piloted in Dundee – to name but a few.
Other examples of MaaS in practice, include: Uber, which is expanding its market by bringing different forms of transport onto the platform; Citymapper, a journey planning app bringing in different ways of paying for and commissioning your own travel; Transit App, a navigational app based in Montreal, Canada; and Kisio’s PlanBookTicket, a mobile ticketing solution.
Stephen Miller, the Communications Lead at Transit outlined the work they are doing. Transit provides navigational services getting people from A-B without their own car, shows nearby transport and other mode options, and can track buses and trains approaching in real time. It also includes bike share, car share, your own bike, walking and now scooters, showing how multiple modes can integrate. It is the number three navigation app in the US and Canada, after Google Maps and Waze.
With PlanBookTicket, Kisio has moved towards a one platform MaaS, as described by their Chief Product Officer, Laurent Leca. It covers the data platform, trip planner, booking and ticketing, and analytics. Providing a seamless user experience, it offers a full ticket range which can be purchased with or without an account and it enables flexible integration with the existing infrastructure, making it affordable for medium-sized cities.
These real world examples show that MaaS is about enabling a simple and combined experience. Such initiatives are a good example of how the public and private sector are working together by combining various transport options. Nevertheless, there are still issues that need to be addressed for MaaS to be a true success.
Subscription or account based MaaS
MaaS has been referred to as the ‘Netflix of transportation’. However, a digital platform is very different to providing physical services and there are a lot of different services available for providing transport. In consideration of what might be the best model for MaaS, two were discussed: subscription based and account based.
Subscription based benefits:
- Commitment to package means usage of car may be reduced, therefore shifting behaviour
- Potential to support initial pilots
- Under-utilised subscriptions may have roll-over model to ensure passengers don’t miss out
However, various issues were also highlighted. For example, subscription based models could favour those who can afford to pre-pay for their transport; there are potential barriers in relation to which package is most suitable and the geography of services; and there are national constraints of supply and demand.
It was also noted that the subscription demographic is a very niche one that is already well served by a mix of mobility options, but it doesn’t cover everybody. It was therefore argued that there is a need to look at different options to make it more universal.
Unlike Netflix, there is finite capacity within the transportation system and a lot of transport systems are physically constrained by something.
It was therefore suggested that perhaps more of an ‘Amazon for transportation model’ is more appropriate, where users can pay as they go for the services they need when they need them. This paves the way for an account based model.
Account based benefits:
- Puts the city at the centre of MaaS
- Customer does not need to pre-select their package – lower barrier to entry, more flexibility for customer and city
- Greater equity – pay for travel once consumed
- Greater ability to link together transit, tolling, parking and other mobility solutions
It was suggested that this provides a much more holistic option.
Future of public transit
With the success of numerous pilots across the globe, and with 85% of transport professionals in the UK who responded to the Landor Links 2018 annual survey of Mobility as a Service perceiving MaaS as an opportunity and something that would improve matters, both socially and environmentally, MaaS may well be the future of urban mobility.
Perhaps one concern, as highlighted by the author of the survey, Beate Kubitz, is resistance among public transport operators, the very people that are expected to provide the services. They only made up 4% of responses to the survey. The reason cited was because they are concerned about the costs and don’t see the business case. The automotive industry on the other hand is moving towards cooperation and collaboration with MaaS. Clearly more work is needed to increase cooperation and collaboration among the public sector.
Nevertheless, as highlighted throughout the webinar, the fundamentals are there for MaaS to be a success.
If you enjoyed reading this, you may also be interested in our other posts on the potential of smart cities and lessons from public transport in Nordic countries.
Follow us on Twitter to discover which topics are interesting our research team.
Pingback: Regaining momentum: can Mobility-as-a-Service get back on the road? | The Knowledge Exchange Blog
Pingback: Guest post: If we all choose the fastest mode of travel in a city, the whole city gets slower – and more congested | The Knowledge Exchange Blog
Pingback: Transport’s journey to sustainability | The Knowledge Exchange Blog
Pingback: How smart is your city? | The Knowledge Exchange Blog
Pingback: The dash from cash: can public transport providers balance the needs of staff and customers? | The Knowledge Exchange Blog
Pingback: Reading the city: wayfinding is about more than getting from A to B | The Knowledge Exchange Blog